| Description |
Sibling relationship is one of the longest and most intensive relationships in our lives (Cicirelli, 1995). Life with a sibling with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with confrontation, balancing and coping with problems and difficulties brought by this difficulty (Smith & Perry, 2005). Siblings of children with ASD experience similar stressful situations and tension as their parents and care for the siblings on a daily basis. The presence of the disease in family system can have a number of negative impacts on them, such as difficulties in adaptation, problem behavior and decrease in overall quality of life (Sharpe, 2002). Even though siblings express the desire to obtain information and understand the brother’s/sister’s disability (Dyson, 1998), professionals focus mainly on supporting the parents while the siblings gain much less attention. (Naylor & Prescott, 2004) One of the intervention possibilities that could be easily implemented into leisure time curriculum activities of any special needs school, focusing on siblings of children with disabilities, are group therapeutic-educational programs; however, this kind of programs is not very widespread in EU and is only beginning to be implemented. Our team had created, implemented and evaluated the STEPS program. STEPS is a 10 session (2 hours/week; 6-10 children; 7-11 years; co-educated group) group therapeutic-educational program for siblings of children with ASD. It is focused on enhancing knowledge about ASD, coping skills training, providing of safe environment to express feelings, peer support, place to relax, having fun and strengthening of self-esteem. The aim of this contribution is to present organization, content and outputs of a pilot study of the first conducted STEPS group. Specifically, we would like to present the results of changes in domains of knowledge about ASD, sibling relationship, behavioral and emotional difficulties, self-esteem and quality of life before and after the program, perceived by siblings and their parents. The systematic feedback of participants and their parents will also be presented. Although the results are preliminary and with some methodological flaws (small sample, absence of comparison group, no follow up), the study shows some promises and may be an inspiration for future work in this area.
|